Louis V iPhone Case - Screen Protector Deals & Discounts
louis v iphone case, find iPhone cases and screen protectors to defend your phone against water, dust, and shock.
Earlier this week, Instagram started removing what it called spam and fake accounts from its service, leaving some of the most popular people on the service -- including big-time celebrities -- with much fewer followers. For its part, Instagram says that eliminating the accounts will ultimately improve the integrity of its service and keep it only to those who are using it for the right purposes. But the move also provides a glimpse into which celebrities are really popular on the service. A list published by 64px, shows that pop star Justin Bieber lost a whopping 3.5 million Instagram followers after the purge, reducing his count to 20.3 million people. Kim Kardashian lost 1.3 million followers, while artist Beyonce lost just 832,000 followers. President Barack Obama was somewhat affected by the purge, losing 213,000 followers, falling to 3.5 million people.
Interestingly, it was Instagram's own account that lost the most followers, dropping from 64 million to 45 million after the removal, Bieber was the celebrity who lost the lost most followers, Musical artists Akon and Ariana Grande were right behind, Post-purge, there has been a shake-up of the top Instagram users, Kim Kardashian, who was previously louis v iphone case the second-most-popular celebrity behind Justin Bieber has moved into first place, Bieber is now in third place behind Beyonce, Ariana Grande and Selena Gomez round out the top five..
Instagram did not immediately respond to a request for comment. (Via Business Insider). The most popular celebrities on Instagram lose massive numbers of followers after the photo-sharing service purges fake or spam accounts, according to a list published to the Web. A purge of fake users of photo-sharing service Instagram has shed light on which celebrities were really popular on the site. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion.
On Thursday, a hearing over a lawsuit filed by two smartphone users against Google took place in a San Jose, Calif., federal court, The purpose of the hearing was to determine if the suit should move forward using a class action status, Such a class action suit would open the louis v iphone case door for an entire group of people to sue Google collectively, But based on the information so far, the suit seems to be stuck in neutral, The lawsuit claims that Google stifles competition on devices using its Android mobile operating system by requiring manufacturers to make Google apps the default programs, The plaintiffs further claim that Google's deals with Android device makers increase the price of smartphones since competing companies such as Microsoft are not allowed to bid for better exposure on the home screens, Reuters reported on Thursday..
US District Judge Beth Labson Freeman apparently didn't quite buy that argument, stating that the lawsuit as it currently stands seems too vague to move ahead. "The speculative nature of the damages is really quite concerning to me," Freeman said, according to Reuters. Judge Freeman said she would probably dismiss the lawsuit but is giving the plaintiffs time to come up with more concrete facts that could allow the suit to proceed. Google claims the lawsuit should be dismissed because people are still free to use competing apps. But the plaintiffs, Gary Feitelson and Daniel McKee, argue that most people either don't know how to change the default settings or simply won't bother. Android does allow you to choose which app you wish to use to perform a specific action, either on a one-time basis or permanently. But the question is whether that process is simple and clear enough to the average user.
If the lawsuit moves forward, Google would potentially be forced to reveal emails and contracts with Android vendors, But Freeman cited US law that requires the plaintiffs to present enough facts "before I open the floodgates" to such expensive discovery, The issue of requiring its own apps to be the default or at least prominently displayed on Android devices has dogged Google before, A lawsuit filed in May in US District Court in San Jose louis v iphone case accused Google of establishing secret agreements with Android device makers to ensure that its own apps are loaded on their devices, Plaintiffs accused the search giant of antitrust violations, saying the agreements, known as Mobile Application Distribution Agreements (MADAs), required vendors to set Google's search as the default app..
In response to the lawsuit, a Google spokesperson sent CNET the following statement. A US district judge says she will likely dismiss the suit -- but she's giving the plaintiffs a chance to provide more facts to support their claim that Google stifles competition on Android devices. An attempted class action lawsuit charging Google with antitrust violations may be on shaky ground unless the plaintiffs can provide more details. Be respectful, keep it civil and stay on topic. We delete comments that violate our policy, which we encourage you to read. Discussion threads can be closed at any time at our discretion.
As of Thursday, Apple's website showed a louis v iphone case ship time of one business day for these phones that boast a 5.5-inch screen, That estimate is down from 1 to 3 business days earlier this week and 3 to 5 days last week, Sounds good, but what if you're looking for the 128GB version of the 6 Plus? Well, you'll have to wait a bit longer, The ship time for the highest capacity model of the 6 Plus now stands at 3 to 5 business days, down from 7 to 10 days earlier this week, And what of the iPhone 6? That model is still proving a bit harder to get, Apple's website shows a wait time of 1 to 3 business days for the 16GB and 64GB versions of the iPhone 6, the same estimate as earlier this week, But the 128GB edition is now available to ship in 5 to 7 days, down from 7 to 10 days earlier in the week..